CJA 354 Week 3 Complete
DQ
1.
According
to Lipmann (2010), white collar crimes are “committed by an individual of high
status in the course of his or her occupation” . He states further the “U.S.
Justice Department defines white-collar crime as an illegal act that employs
deceit and concealment rather than the application of force to obtain money,
property, or service, to avoid the payment or loss of money, or to secure a
business or professional advantage” (Contemporary Criminal Law. Concepts,
Cases, and Controversies, 2nd ed.).
Please
respond to the following:
(1)
Explain why Money Laundering is considered a white collar crime.
(2)
Should white collar crimes be more severely punished than blue collar crimes?
(3)
Should there be a distinction between white collar and blue collar crimes?
DQ 2.
Statutory
rape is defined as a strict liability offense of intercourse with an underage
individual. A strict liability offense is a crime that does not require a
criminal intent.
Based
on the definition of statutory rape, respond to the following questions:
What
distinctions can be made between rape and statutory rape? Should the
distinctions exist? Explain your response.
Why
have many states changed the offense of statutory rape to criminal sexual
conduct?
DQ 3.
·
What is the definition of homicide?
·
What distinctions can be made about different types of homicide?
·
Compare and contrast the criteria for the types and how they affect the
criminal justice system.
For
this assignment, you will choose from the following options:
·
Option 1: Personal Crimes Analysis
Presentation
·
Option 2: Personal Crimes Analysis Matrix
·
Option 3: Personal Crimes Analysis
Posterboard
Read
the instructions in the University of Phoenix Material: Personal Crimes
Analysis located on the student website.
Select
one of the following options to complete the assignment.
Cite to at least two (2)
academic resources.
Cite to your text and/or
your electronic readings.
Complete
the University of Phoenix Material: Week Three Worksheet.
Be
sure to include your name on the worksheet.
Resource:
University of Phoenix Material: State v.
Stu Dents
Discuss
the case as if you are part of the prosecuting team in State v. Stu Dents to develop your argument.
Write
a 700- to 1,050-word paper that details the team’s argument.
List the elements of each crime
and facts that establish each element.
Provide a specific law for each
charge. List the state where the law is effective. Each team member’s state
needs to be represented.
Include the state where your case
would be the strongest.
Cite to at least two (2)
academic resources.
Cite to your text and/or
your electronic readings.
Format your paper consistent with
APA guidelines.
To
download the complete paper click CJA
354 Week 3 Complete
Looking
for other tutorials of CJA 354 class..??
Want
to check other classes..?? Visit www.StudentWhiz.com
No comments:
Post a Comment